MICHIGAN CHESS ASSOCIATION

Analysis by Mervin Draper
The study of important grandmaster games can be instructive and interesting for the average player. Even though many draws were agreed upon in the World Chess Council (WCC) candidate final match between Kramnik and Shirov for the right to meet Kasparov in October for that  organization's championship, many of the drawn games were every bit as instructive as the wins and losses.
In situations where the number of attackers and defenders are balanced in kind and numbers, but further resources cannot be brought to bear directly on a target square or piece, look for any defender or attacker that can be attacked.  As a defense such a tactic can maintain the balance in a position or even begin a counter attack. Many players may use this technique instinctively in combinations, but most tactics books and articles dwell mainly on its offensive application.
In game seven, Shirov provides an excellent example of indirect defense by counter attacking one of the attackers. The application might be called "removing an attacker" since it is analogous to the offensive tactic of "removing a guard" which is the tactical idea of removing one of the pieces guarding an attacked piece or square.


Kramnik,V. (2790)-Shirov,A.(2710) (WCC Candidates final, Game 7)
Grünfeld: Kemeri [D78/04 (2nd ed.)]
1998.06.02. ESP Cazoria
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6
This is another Grünfeld Defense, but a different variation than the popular, sharp, exchange variation used in earlier match games.

3.g3
The g3 move is rather passive for White. Kramnik fianchettoes his bishop and delays developing his queen's knight until he can decide upon its best square. In the Grünfeld Defense, Black keys a lot of his game plan on the placement of the white queen's knight, so this move order is a little gamesmanship on White's part.

3...c6
Black prepares d5 since it will come under attack from the bishop at g2.

4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Nc3 d5
White defends d4 because he knows it will come under attack.

6.Qb3 0-0
White develops the queen to attack d5. Black castles as soon as he can even though his d5 pawn is under heavy attack.

7. Bg2 Qb6!
White has Black's d5 pawn under attack three times and four times if the knight at f3 moves.  Black can defend directly by ...e6.  Be6 is impossible because that would leave the pawn at b7 undefended.  But by attacking one of the attackers of his d5 pawn, black indirectly defends it and presents White with the choice of exchanging queens or losing a tempo when the queen moves.
Black confronts the white queen as discussed above, indirectly defending the d5 pawn by attacking the most important of the assaulting pieces. The queen move also guards b5 allowing 8...Bf5 and 9...e6

After 7...Qb6!
8.0-0 Bf5
White chooses neither to exchange, move the queen, or resolve the center, opting instead for king safety and further development, leaving the decision to exchange up to Black.  Black also opts for further development casting the exchange decision back to White.

9.Ne5 e6
Both sides are now well developed.  The white knight at d5 is especially aggressive while the black bishop at f5 will become a target White's king's side pawns.

10.Bf4 Nbd7
Continued development, attacking the knight at d5 and letting the black knights support each other.

11.Qxb6 axb6
Finally the simplifying queen exchange.  Black has gained an open file and an attack of the a2 pawn as compensation for doubled pawns. The white pawn at c4 becomes unprotected, but Black wishes to maintain a strong pawn center.

12.f3
The threat here is to attack the bishop at f5 to break through in the center and/or win material. 13.e4 dxe4 14.fxe4 Bxe4 15.Bxe4 Nxe4 16.Nxd7

After 12.f3
12...Nxe5
Black defends against the above threat by capturing with the knight that would have been unprotected if the knight at f6 captured at e4.  13.e4 still appears uncomfortable for Black but defendable.

13.Bxe5
White recaptures so as not to double pawns and also confront the black bishop at g7.

13...g5
Black creates a flight square for his bishop.  White's center is becoming mobile.

14.e4 Bg6
White expands in the center and Black retreats his bishop rather than capture the pawn at e4.

15.b3 Rfd8
White defends his c-pawn while Black moves his rook to a file he intends to open.

16.Rfd1 dxe4
Black opens the d-file.  Notice the attack on d4 is renewed, a major theme in the Grünfeld.

17.fxe4 Ng4
White retook opening the f-file, and Black threatens to exchange his knight for the bishop on e5.

18.Bxg7 Kxg7
Trading bishop for bishop

19.Bf3 h5
Black decides to maintain his knight on g4 rather than retreat.  Additionally the black rooks would be able to operate on the h-file.

20.Rd2 Ne5
The black knight attacks the bishop at f3, threatening to fork the white king and rook.

21.Bg2 c5 22.d5
The pawn was crying out, "Move me." The strong point at d5 needed to be occupied; also, white threatens to create a passed pawn.

22...Nc6 23.Rad1 Nd4
The black knight moves to a new outpost where it interferes with the rooks' protection of the pawn on d5.

24.e5 exd5 25.cxd5 Re8 26.Re1 Nc2
White now has a passed pawn.

27.Ree2 Nd4
Black keeps the rook under attack.

28.Re1 Nc2
Black is offering a draw by repeating his knight move to c2.

29.Rxc2 Bxc2
White declines the draw by sacrificing a rook for a bishop.  He has a well protected passed pawn that must be stopped for black to draw.  Shirov leads in the match by a game so he was willing to settle for a draw.  If Kramnik had won, the match would have been tied.

30.d6 Bf5
White doesn't control the queening square, and Black moves to blockade the pawn's advance with the bishop.

31.Bxb7 Rad8 32.Bc6 Re6 33.Bd5 Rdxd6
Black captures the passed pawn and the d5 pawn is pinned against the white rook.

34.Bxe6 ½-½

Final position
Black is a pawn ahead. White's bishop will fall and the game might have continued. 34...Rxd6 with the e-pawn falling after 35...Kg6 (to move away from g7 where it could be checked by 36.exf6, forcing the exchange of rooks.) 36...f6, 37...fxe6 or 37...Rxe6