MICHIGAN CHESS ASSOCIATION

Michigan
March
2000
Chess
Online
Analysis and Commentary by
Bob Ciaffone
    Ward, coming off a period of inactivity, had a poor showing in the 1999 Michigan Open and temporarily lost his masters rating.  His 4-0 result in this tournament got it back and served notice that he is ready to reclaim his place as one of Michigan's leading players in the new millennium.

Tom Ward (2160) - Bob Ciaffone (2215)
[B87/02] Sicilian: Scheveningen (Sozin)
Michigan Masters/Experts Tournament
USA Grand Rapids, MI, Rd.2, January 9, 2000
1.e4 c5
I am a confirmed Sicilian Defense adherent.
2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 d6
This is the Scheveningen Variation.
6.Be3 6...a6 7.Bc4
Combining Bc4 with Be3 can lead into the Velimirovic Attack, a walk on the wild side. 
7...b5 8.Bb3 Bb7 9.f3?!
The most effective way to bring the Bb3 into the game is to play f4, which involves sacrificing the e-pawn.  According to theory, Black is okay, but he is in dire need of a good map to get through the deep complications that arise.
9...Nbd7 10.Qe2 Nc5 11.0-0-0
We now have the same position from which I beat Tony Palmer in the 1999 Michigan Open. 
11...Qc7
After the game I thought that 11...b4 was a star move that put Black on top.  This was based on 12.Nb1 d5, leading to a clear advantage for Black.  I had believed that 12.Na4 was unplayable, as it loses a piece to 12...Qa5, as after 13.Nxc5 dxc5 the attacked Nd4 has no squares.  But a few days later, after looking over this line with Ward and Dave Hahn, they showed me that the White piece sacrifice 14.Nxe6 fxe6 15.Bxe6 presented Black with extremely serious problems.  I later analyzed the sac with IM Jack Peters, and the conclusion we reached was that Black cannot survive in this line.
12.g4 Be7 13.g5 Nfd7 14.h4!
Clearly superior to Palmer's 14.Bd5, as my notes in Michigan Chess to that game showed.  The position seems about even now. 
14...Nxb3+ 15.axb3 b4 16.Na4 d5?
Unsound; best looks 16...Nc5.
17.exd5 bxd5 18.Kb1?
My opponent fails to punish me with the exchange sacrifice 18.Nf5! Bxb3 19.Rxd7!, which is very strong for White.
18...Qb7 19.Rhf1
Maybe 19.Rh3 is a little better - (Ward).
19...0-0?!
Too committal; 19...g6 is better. 
20.f4 g6 21.h5 Rfe8?
Correct is 21...Rfd8! to support the minors on the d-file, after which the position is unclear.  The previous play has been a bit spotty by both players, but from here on all White's moves are exemplary.
22.Qd2!
Highlighting Black's failure to shore up the d-file, white is able to achieve the devastating f5 break.
22...Rad8 23.f5 e5
Here or after trades on g6, I thought the knight would have to go back to e2, and maybe I could hold.  But at the end of the game, the stubborn beast was still sitting on d4.  Ward gave me a chance to take it on each of the next ten moves, but to do so would have lead to an even faster demise for Black than occurred in the game.
24.fxg6 hxg6 25.hxg6 fxg6 26.Qh2! Bf8 27.Rh1 Bg7?
Giving up the queen with 27...Bxh1 28.Rxh1 Qxh1 29.Qxh1 exd4 30.Bxd4 would have avoided the forced loss for Black that actually occurred, but even so, his survival chances would have been dismal.
28.Qh7+ Kf8 29.Rhf1+ Bf7 30.Rxf7+ Kxf7 31.Rf1+ Ke7 32.Qxg7+ Kd6 33.Qxg6+ 1-0.
I resigned here, as the Nd4 that held its position all this time is about to jump in with Nc6+ winning the house.  A nicely played finale by Tom Ward.  Nobody likes to lose, but if you do get beaten, it might as well be by a good friend who benefits from the victory by going on to win the event.
TOP
© 2000 Michigan Chess Association
COVER

[Home] [Tournament Calendar] [Scholastic Section] [Expiration Look-up]
[Archives] [Contacts] [Clubs] [Memberships] [Links] [More...]
© 2006 Michigan Chess Association. All Rights Reserved.