MICHIGAN CHESS ASSOCIATION

Michigan
January
February
2001
Chess
Online
2000 Region V Championship
Introduction by Ben Finegold
    The Region V got 65-68 players, depending on whether you count Housemen and no-shows and free entries and such. There were three masters and six experts.
    The tournament ran well.  All rounds started on time, except round 1, which was 15 minutes late.  The pairings were posted 15-60 minutes before the start of each round.  Ed Mandell provided free coffee, apple cider, donuts, water, and muffins to the participants.
    Ed also contributed an upset prize of $10 Gift Certificate to his store for the biggest upset of every round.
    Everything went quite well in my opinion. Ameer Ghobrial is the Region V Champion with a perfect 5-0.
Region V Games
    Black, the opening columnist for Michigan Chess, takes his lower-rated opponent too lightly and gets a bad position early on. He is forced into a speculative pawn sacrifice just to keep from getting an inferior position. In the middlegame, the game turns around and black gets the advantage, but white has just enough play to draw.
Ricky Reid  (1512) - Bob Ciaffone  (2212)
[D02] Queen's Pawn: Zukertort (Catalan)
Round 1
(Annotated by Bob Ciaffone)
1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.g3  
    This system has little bite, but is a good choice with white against a stronger player because it is very solid.
3...Bf5 
    My usual response. The move 3...Bg4 is also good.
4.Bg2 e6 5.Nbd2 h6 6.a3?! 
    I frankly do not understand how people, even weaker players, produce a move like this. It is obvious that Black is not going to be using the b4-square for a piece, so it prevents nothing. The automatic move for White, the one every 500 player would make, is to castle.
6...Be7 7.O-O O-O 8.Ne5 c5 
    This move of Black's looks natural, because the d4 square has been weakened by 8.Ne5. But it makes the white move a3 have some point, so 8...Nbd7 was indicated.
9.dxc5 Bxc5 10.c4! Nc6?! 
    Natural, but an error creating a weak pawn, which White is alert to exploit.
11.Nxc6! 11...bxc6

WHAT SHOULD WHITE PLAY?
12.Nb3!  
    This knight is going to d4, and either going to injure Black's pawn structure or win a pawn. Black has been outplayed.
12...Bb6 13.c5 Bc7 14.Nd4 Bg6  
    I give up a pawn to keep some play. Black does not have enough for the pawn, but the position is complicated.
15.Nxc6 Qd7 16.Nd4 e5 17.Nf3 a5 18.Bd2 a4 19.Bb4 Rfd8 20.Nd2 Qb5 21.b3 axb3 22.Nxb3 Ne4 23.f3 Ng5 24.Rc1 Ne6 25.Qd2 Rac8 26.f4 Be4 27.f5?! 
    This lemon releases the pressure on Black's center.
27...Ng5 28.h4 Bxg2 29.hxg5?! 
    29.Kxg2! Ne4 30.Qe3 Bb8 31.Nd2
29...Bxf1 30.Rxf1 hxg5 31.Qxg5 f6 32.Qg4 
    The dust has settled and white is down the exchange with no attack. He does have an extra pawn, a passer on the fifth rank, so the position remains sharp.
32...Qc4?! 
    Black kills the vestiges of White's attack by trading queens and forcing an ending, but at the cost of a weak pawn.
33.Qxc4 dxc4 34.Nd2 Rd4 35.Rc1 Rg4 36.Kf2 e4 37.Nxc4 Bxg3+ 38.Kf1 Kf7 
    Black by this move transfers his remaining rook to attack the enemy king, but leaves his own monarch exposed to the elements. It turns out the attack is only strong enough to force a perpetual check, so White escapes with a draw.
39.Rd1 Rh8 40.Rd7+ Ke8 41.c6 Rh1+ 42.Kg2 Rh2+ 43.Kf1 ½-½.
 
    Neither side can escape a draw without losing.

    White, seeking a sharp game against a much lower rated opponent, castles on the opposite wing. Black plays the middlegame strongly and strikes first, putting his opponent under strong pressure. At the critical moment he then falters, and the game becomes unclear. Then White tries too hard to win, and winds up with a goose egg.
Bob Ciaffone  (2212) - Justin Aldrich  (1561)
[D43] Semi-Slav: Anti-Meran
Round 3
(Annotated by Bob Ciaffone)
1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.c4 c6 4.Nc3 e6 
    Black plays the Semi-Slav defense, characterized by the pawn triangle c6-d5-e6. I know something about it, having played the black side for a quarter-century.
5.Bg5  
    White plays the sharpest line against the Semi-Slav, inviting the Botvinnik Variation if Black plays 5...dxc4 or the Moscow Variation if black plays 5...h6 6.Bh5 dxc4. Both of these gambits are a maze of complications.
5...Be7 
    This transposes to the Queens Gambit Declined with black committed to the passive c6. Still, Black has a solid formation.
6.e3 Nbd7 7.Qc2 h6 8.Bh4 O-O 9.O-O-O!? 
    I play the sharpest line, leading to a wild brawl. IM Ben Finegold had white in this exact position against Seirawan a couple of years ago and played the solid 9.Rd1, but his opponent played a new idea and white got no advantage; the result was a draw.
9...dxc4 
    I was not unhappy to see this move, as my bishop comes into the game with tempo.
10.Bxc4 Nb6 11.Bb3 
    A new move in my database. According to my coach Jack Peters, it is likely better than the previously played 11.Bd3.
11...Bd7 
    Looks funny, because the bishop seemingly does nothing here.
12.Kb1?! 
    I assumed the bishop had moved to allow Back to play Rc8, and took advance prevention against that move. But Black has another idea; advance the queenside pawns. White should have played 12.Ne5 with good prospects.
12...Nbd5! 13.a3?! 
    White leads with his chin, allowing lines to be opened against his king.
13...b5! 14.Nxd5 cxd5 15.Rc1 a5! 
    All the activity is taking place in the vicinity of White's king, a sign that he has been outplayed in the middlegame.
16.Qd3 a4 17.Bc2 Ne4 18.Bxe7 Qxe7 19.Ne5 Rfb8! 20.f3 Nf6 21.Bd1 b4 22.Rc5 bxa3 23.Qxa3 Qf8! 24.Bc2 Rb7! 25.Rc1 Rab8 
    White sees that he can get two rooks for queen and pawn--he thinks.
26.Bd1 Rxb2+! 27.Qxb2 a3!! 
    The flaw in White's calculations.
28.Qb3 Rxb3+? 
    Very natural, but Black should have looked a little harder, as he had a knockout punch. 28...Ba4! 29.Qxb8? (29.Ka2 Bxb3+ 30.Bxb3) 29...Qxb8+ 30.Ka1 Qb2#.
29.Bxb3 Kh7 30.Ka2 Qa8 31.Nxf7 
    31.R1c3 Qa6 32.Bc2+ Kg8 33.Bd3 Qa4 34.Bc2 Qa6
31...Qa6 32.R1c3 Ba4! 
    By exchanging his bad bishop, Black gets the ending of queen and knight against two rooks and knight, which should be a draw.
33.Ne5 Bxb3+ 34.Rxb3 Qe2+ 35.Kxa3 Qxg2 36.Rb2 Qg1 37.Rc3 Qa1+ 38.Kb3 Qa7 39.Ra2 Qb7+ 40.Kc2 Qb5 41.Nd3 Ne8! 
    Black's knight comes into the game with decisive effect.
42.Rb2 Qa6 43.Kd2 Nd6 44.Ne5 Qf1 45.Rbc2 Nf5! 
    Positional paydirt for the black horse.
46.Rd3 Qf2+ 47.Kc1 Qe1+ 48.Kb2 Nxe3 49.Rc6 Qb4+ 50.Kc1 Nf5 51.Rxe6 Nxd4 52.Re8 Qc5+ 53.Kb2 Qb5+ 54.Kc3 Ne2+ 55.Kd2 Qxe8 0-1. 
    The ending was probably a draw, but White tried to win and overpressed. A nice early middle game by Black, showing that to castle on opposite wings can bite both ways for the first player.

    Getting a piece off the back rank is not necessarily developing it. Some grandmasters like to call such “development” a half-move. In this game Black develops both bishops with half-moves, getting a passive game. White grabs a pawn, which should have been only a temporary material advantage. Black, instead of regaining the material, chooses to play a gambit, but fails to get sufficient compensation, and loses.
Ameer Ghobriel  (2101) - Jennifer Skidmore  (1912)
[A25] English: Closed Sicilian (Carls)
Round 3
(Annotated by Bob Ciaffone)
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 f5 4.Bg2 Nf6 5.e3 d6 6.Nge2 Be7 7.d4 O-O 8.O-O Qe8 9.Rb1 Bd7 
    I like 9... a5 here, so that if White presses on with a3 and b4 then Black's rook will be developed without moving. It would then be quite reasonable to leave the bishop on c8, protecting the b-pawn.
10.b4 Nd8 
    Black seems to have too many pieces and not enough squares, but I am not convinced by the way White tries to exploit this.
11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Nd5 Nxd5 13.Qxd5+ Be6 14.Qxe5 Bd6 
    I think that Black could just recapture 14...Bxc4. For example 15.Bb2 Qf7! and Black would be fine. Instead, she elects a pawn-down position with some, but not enough, chances for a k-side attack.
15.Qc3 Nc6 16.Nd4 Nxd4 17.exd4 c6 18.Bb2 Qf7 19.d5 cxd5 20.cxd5 Bd7 21.Rfe1 f4 22.Qd4! Qg6 23.Be4 Qh6 24.a3 Rf7 25.Bg2 Raf8 26.Rbd1 Bh3  
    Whites last move prepared a devastating answer to this. Instead, it looks as if ...Rf5, intending ...Rh5 might keep it interesting.
27.Re6!! fxg3  
    Relatively best was to accept with 27...Bxe6 28.dxe6 Qxe6 but 29.Qxd6 leaves White well on top with two splendid bishops against a rook. The text is hopeless. 
28.Rxh6 gxf2+ 29.Kf1 Bd7 30.Rxd6 1-0.

    White, a youngster, plays the Exchange Variation of the Ruy Lopez. He manages to get to an even and rather drawish position with bishops of opposite colors, but his veteran opponent manages to get from there into a pure two-rook ending, and experience then triumphs over youth--this time.
Paul Nemeth  (1792) - Phil Roe  (2065)
[C69] Spanish: Exchange (Gligoric)
Round 3
(Annotated by Phil Roe)
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.O-O 
    Paul Nemeth is 13 years old. If he will forgive my saying so, he looks even younger.  It can be disconcerting when someone so small not only sports a high rating, but displays a very sophisticated taste in openings. The Exchange Lopez is difficult to play against, not only because Black must be careful not to fall into a bad ending, but because the middlegame also has its perils, as Bobby Fischer made plain.
5...f6 6.d4 Bg4 7.Be3 
    The books give either 7.c3 supporting the center, or 7.dxe5 forcing exchanges such as 7...Qxd1 8.Rxd1 Bxf3 8.gxf3 fxe5. But Black is supposed to be equal in those lines, and the less explored text cannot be bad.
7...exd4 8.Qxd4 Qxd4 9.Nxd4 Bc5 10.h3 Bxd4 11.Bxd4 O-O-O 12.Be3 Be6 
    So I have equalized. White might turn his k-side majority into a passed pawn, but the opposite bishops would make promotion very hard. But how do I create winning chances?
13.Nc3 Ne7 14.Rfd1 b6 15.Kf1 
    A nice move, centralizing and waiting.  I improve my pawns and create opportunities for my knight.
15...c5 16.a4? 
    Although this does threaten a thematic a5 push, that is easily prevented. Since Black is planning Ne7-c6-d4, a defensive Ne2 with c3 if necessary seems advisable.
16...Nc6 17.Nd5 Bxd5 18.exd5 Nb4 19.c4 Nc2 20.Rac1 Nxe3+ 21.fxe3 Rhe8 
    Black is now clearly better, though not by much. White has only the one weakness to defend on e3, but that confines him to passivity while I prevent a5, liquidate my doubled pawn, improve my king and make some kingside advances but even all that will not be enough.
22.Ke2 a5 23.Rf1 c6 24.dxc6 Kc7 25.Rcd1 Kxc6 26.Kf3 f5 27.g3 g6 28.Rfe1 h6 29.Kf2 Rf8 30.Ke2 g5? 
    On the last move before the time control I make a move that is much too committal and weakens f5; 30...Rde8 first was better. White should now play 31.Rxd8! Rxd8 32.Rf1 Rf8 33.e4 with no problems. The general idea is to keep some pressure against e3, and push a pawn to g4 or h4 to create both a second weakness for White and the chance of a remote passed pawn for Black. Black either wants all rooks on the board, or none. But he will let White exchange one pair if it gives him permanent control of a file. So before doubling rooks he avoids the exchange by abandoning the d-file. I am not sure if this plan is actually winning but White definitely has a difficult game to manage.
31.Kf3? Rde8! 32.Rd3 Re4 33.b3 Rfe8 34.Red1 R8e6! 
    In the ensuing maneuvers Black is careful to keep one Rook on the 6th rank.
35.R1d2 g4+ 36.hxg4 fxg4+ 37.Ke2 Rf6 38.Rd1 Ree6! 39.Rf1 
    After this the two weaknesses e3, g3 cannot be held without entering a lost pawn ending, but passive moves allow ...Rf3 and ...Ref6
39...Rxf1 40.Kxf1 Rf6+! 41.Ke2 
    Or 41.Kg2 Rd6 42.Rxd6 Kxd6 43.Kf2 Ke5 44.Ke1 Ke5 45.Ke2 h5. Black only wins because this tempo move is still available.
41...Rf3 42.e4 Rxd3 43.Kxd3 Kd6 44.Ke3 
    Or 44.Kd2 Ke5 45.Ke3 h5 46.Kd3 Kf6 47.Ke3 Kg5 leading to the same positions as in the game.
44...Ke5 45.Kd3 Kf6! 46.Ke3 Kg5 47.Kf2 h5 48.Ke3 h4 49.gxh4+ Kxh4 50.e5 Kg5 51.Ke4 g3 0-1.

    Black essays a Sicilian Defense line that gives him a weak central square, but gives him sufficient piece play in compensation. But something goes wrong, and white gets a big advantage in the form of a weakened black pawn structure on the kingside. White is able to successfully attack the enemy monarch.
Phil Roe  (2065) - Ray Santiago  (2031)
[B32] Sicilian: Labourdonnais (Löwenthal)
Round 4
(Annotated by Phil Roe)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 e5 5.Nb5 d6 6.c4 Be6 
    This defense has become respectable in recent years, chiefly due to Sveshnikov's discovery that 6...Be7, followed at once by 7...Bg5, to exchange Black's bad bishop for Whites good one, gives a playable position. In the game, by the time Black gets around to this, White already has a big grip.
7.N1c3 a6 8.Na3 Rc8 9.Be3 Be7 10.Nd5! Bg5 11.Bb6 Qd7 12.Nc2! 
    It is not yet clear where the Bf1 should go, but it is clear that the Na3 must sooner or later play to c2.
12...Nf6 13.Bd3 O-O 14.h4!? 
    After ten minutes thought, and I would have liked more. White breaks up Black's k-side, and gets a grip on the light squares, but weakens his own pawns, gives up the dark square bind, and has to trade his good bishop.  A difficult call.
14...Bh6 15.Nxf6+ gxf6 16.Qh5! Kg7 17.Be3! 
    Forced by the threat of Bg4, but a good move anyway.
17...Bxe3 18.Nxe3 
    The position that needed to be evaluated at move 14. It looks good for White, because of the magnificent position of his knight, covering the weaknesses on c2, c4, g4 and hitting the strong points at d5 and f5.
18...Nd4 19.O-O Rg8 20.f4! b5 21.cxb5 axb5 22.f5 Bc4 23.Bxc4 bxc4
24. Ng4! 
    With the nice threat of 25. Qxh7+.
24...Qa7 25.Qh6+ Kh8 26.Qxf6+ Rg7 27.Kh1 
    With the time control approaching, I don’t play very precisely;  Kh2 is better.
27...Ne2 28.Rf3 Rb8 29.h5 Kg8 30.Ne3? 
    The visual appeal of heading to the thematic outpost on d5 was irresistible, but simpler was 30.Nh6+ Kh8 31.Qxd6 Ng3+ 32.Kh2 Nxh5 33.f6 Rg6 34.Rd1!
30...Nf4?? 
    Much better was 30...Ng3+ 31.Kh2 but after either 31...Nxh5 32.Qxd6 or 31...Nxe4 32.Qh4 Ne2 33.Rh3 White still has a winning position.
31.h6 1-0. 
    If 31...Nh5 32.Qh4.

    Black elects to play a solid but rather passive defensive system, after several convolutions in determining the character of the opening. He manages to get his knights onto some bad squares, then commits a tactical error. White gets an iron grip which black is unable to shake.
Nelson Marcelino  (1922) - Justin Aldrich  (1561)
[D51] Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Pillsbury (Exchange)
Round 5
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 Nbd7 6.cxd5  
    If Black takes back with the c-pawn, the opening transposes to an Exchange Slav, but with Black's queen-knight misplaced on d7 (it belongs on c6). If Black takes back with the e-pawn, his knight on d7 gives White a pull, because the development of the queen-bishop is delayed for a while. This exchange in the center by white here is often used by grandmasters.
6...cxd5 
    Black elects an Exchange Slav. The opening is defined.
7.e3 a6 8.Bd3 Be7 9.O-O O-O 10.Rc1 h6 11.Bh4 Nh7 12.Bg3 Ndf6  
    Black's last couple of knight moves do not make a good impression.
13.Na4 Bd6 14.Ne5  
    White has a big advantage here.
14...Nd7?
 
    A tactical error, losing a pawn because the Black queen no longer guards the Bd6.
15.Nxf7! Rxf7 16.Bxd6 Ndf6 17.Be5 b5 18.Nc5 
    Black has no compensation for his pawn minus.
18...Qe7 19.Bg6 Rf8 20.Nd3 Bd7 21.Bf4 Rac8 22.Rb1 Be8 23.Ne5 Nd7 24.Qd3 Nhf6 25.Rbc1 Nxe5 26.dxe5 Bxg6 27.Qxg6 Nd7 28.Rc2 Rc4 29.b3 Rxc2 30.Qxc2 Qd8 31.Qc6 
    This wins another Black pawn.
31...Qe7 32.Qxa6 b4 33.Bg3 Nc5 34.Qd6 Qxd6 35.exd6 Rd8 36.Rc1 Ne4 37.Rc6 Nc3 38.Be5 Nxa2 39.Rc7 
    White ends the game by direct attack on the black king.
39...g5 40.Rg7+ Kf8 41.Rh7 Ke8 42.Re7+ Kf8 43.Bg7+ Kg8 44.d7 Kh7 45.Be5+ Kg6 46.g4 Nc3 47.Rg7# 1-0. 
    The opening Black ultimately selected was a bad choice for his piece layout. Having his queen-knight on d7 led to a passive position. If he wishes to continue playing these same opening moves, I recommend taking back on d5 with the e-pawn and playing a Queens Gambit Declined Exchange Variation.

Don Vandivier  (1851) - Thomas Mazuchowski  (2096)
[A16] English: Anglo-Indian (Queen's Knight)
Round 5
(Annotated by Don Vandivier)
    I’ve had White against Tom the last 4 times we’ve played!  Last game we drew, but I still remember the thrashing Tom gave me 2 games prior to that with his Dragon Sicilian lines.  Now, in the last round, and needing a win, I decided to NOT to allow the Sicilian Dragon.
1.c4 
    I don’t think I’ve ever played this move in serious chess before, but I knew it to be one of the most disliked moves against strong Sicilian players.  It also carries a psychological ploy that White (playing against a stronger opponent) may be playing for a draw.
1...Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 O-O 5.d3 d6 6.Bd2 e5 7.Qc1 
    A strange move... which gives away my intensions. I plan on playing the “Van-attack!”, a line I devised for Black against the English. I have beaten  several Experts and Class A players using this system for Black.
7...c6 8.Bf3!? 
    Another strange move... but extremely strong. White has nothing after 8.Bh6? because of 8...Bxh6 9.Qxh6 Ng4 10.Qd2 h5!  This line no longer works now and White threatens Bh6 followed by h4, h5 and hxg6 opening the h-file on the black king.
8...Be6 9.Bh6 Ne8?! 
    Better was 9...d5! striking in the center. Black underestimates the power of White's attack.
10.h4 f5 11.h5 Qf6 
    A good move.  But is Black attacking or defending?
12.hxg6 hxg6 13.Bxg7 Qxg7 14.Qg5 Nd7 15.e4! Qf6 16.Qh6 Kf7 
    Oh!  He's trying to run away from me!
17.Nh3 
    I actually considered 17.Qh7+? Qg7 18.Nh3!? but it’s bad because my queen is stronger than his, especially with his king exposed.
17...Ng7 18.Ng5+ Ke7 19.Nh7 Qf7 
    19...Rh8 is worse.  20.Nxf6 Rxh6 21.Rxh6.
20.Qg5+! 
    Getting the queen off the h-file so that the white rooks can use it.
20...Nf6 21.Nxf8 Rxf8 22.O-O-O Kd7 23.Rh6 fxe4 24.Bxe4 Bf5 
    I expected this move.  It's all that Black has and I found a killer move before going into this line.
25.g4!! Nxg4? 
    All moves leave Black in a lost position. 25...Bxg4 26.Bxg6 or 25...Bxe4 26.dxe4! 
26.Bxf5+ Qxf5 27.Rxg6 
    Simple and to the point. A knight fork! 
27...Qxg5+ 28.Rxg5 Ne6 29.Rxg4 Rxf2 30.Rh1 Kc7 31.Ne4 1-0.
TOP
© 2001 Michigan Chess Association
COVER

[Home] [Tournament Calendar] [Scholastic Section] [Expiration Look-up]
[Archives] [Contacts] [Clubs] [Memberships] [Links] [More...]
© 2006 Michigan Chess Association. All Rights Reserved.